Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R5 235 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
Reasons to consider Radeon R5 235 OEM |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | | Radeon R5 235 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Broadwell GT3e () | vs | Caicos (Caicos XT) |
| Fab Process | 14 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 49 mm² | vs | 67 mm² |
| Transistors | 189 million | vs | 370 million |
| Shaders | 384 | vs | 160 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 300 MHz | vs | 775 MHz |
| ROPs | 6 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 48 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | | Radeon R5 235 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | | Radeon R5 235 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 15 watts | vs | 35 watts |
| Release Date | 5 Sep 2014 | vs | 21 Dec 2013 |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
1.80 GP/s
Radeon R5 235 OEM
3.10 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
14.40 GT/s
Radeon R5 235 OEM
6.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
0.00 GB/s
Radeon R5 235 OEM
14.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
230.40 GFLOPs
Radeon R5 235 OEM
248.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better