Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R9 FURY
Summary
Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
| 260 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon R9 FURY . |
Reasons to consider Radeon R9 FURY |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports TrueAudio |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon R9 FURY
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | | Radeon R9 FURY | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Broadwell GT3e () | vs | Fiji (Fiji PRO) |
| Fab Process | 14 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 49 mm² | vs | 596 mm² |
| Transistors | 189 million | vs | 8,900 million |
| Shaders | 384 | vs | 3584 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 56 |
| Core clock | 300 MHz | vs | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 6 | vs | 64 |
| TMUs | 48 | vs | 224 |
Memory Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | | Radeon R9 FURY | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | HBM |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 4096 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 500 MHz
1000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 4096 Mb |
Additional details
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | | Radeon R9 FURY | |
|---|
| TDP | 15 watts | vs | 275 watts |
| Release Date | 5 Sep 2014 | vs | 10 Jul 2015 |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
1.80 GP/s
Radeon R9 FURY
64.00 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
14.40 GT/s
Radeon R9 FURY
224.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
0.00 GB/s
Radeon R9 FURY
512.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
230.40 GFLOPs
Radeon R9 FURY
7168.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better