Radeon HD 2400 vs Radeon HD 4520
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 2400 |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 4520 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 4520
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 2400 | | Radeon HD 4520 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | RV610 () | vs | RV710 () |
| Fab Process | 65 nm | vs | 55 nm |
| Die Size | 85 mm² | vs | 73 mm² |
| Transistors | 180 million | vs | 242 million |
| Shaders | 40 | vs | 80 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 1 |
| Core clock | 398 MHz | vs | 600 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 4 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 2400 | | Radeon HD 4520 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR2 | vs | DDR2 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 495 MHz
990 MHz effective | vs | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 256 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 2400 | | Radeon HD 4520 | |
|---|
| TDP | 20 watts | vs | 25 watts |
| Release Date | 19 Feb 2008 | vs | 2 Dec 2009 |
Radeon HD 2400
1.59 GP/s
Radeon HD 4520
2.40 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 2400
1.59 GT/s
Radeon HD 4520
4.80 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 2400
7.92 GB/s
Radeon HD 4520
6.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 2400
31.84 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 4520
96.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better