Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand vs GeForce GT 320 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 320 OEM |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand | | GeForce GT 320 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | RV635 (RV635 PRO) | vs | GT215 (GT215-301-A3) |
| Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 135 mm² | vs | 144 mm² |
| Transistors | 378 million | vs | 727 million |
| Shaders | 120 | vs | 72 |
| Compute Units | 3 | vs | 3 |
| Core clock | 796 MHz | vs | 540 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand | | GeForce GT 320 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR2 | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 396 MHz
792 MHz effective | vs | 790 MHz
1580 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand | | GeForce GT 320 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 65 watts | vs | 43 watts |
| Release Date | 22 Nov 2009 | vs | 2 Feb 2010 |
Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand
3.18 GP/s
GeForce GT 320 OEM
4.32 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand
6.37 GT/s
GeForce GT 320 OEM
13.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand
12.70 GB/s
GeForce GT 320 OEM
25.30 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand
191.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GT 320 OEM
187.50 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better