Radeon HD 4730 vs Radeon HD 8510 OEM (Turks PRO)
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 4730 |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8510 OEM (Turks PRO) |
50 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 4730 . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 4730 | | Radeon HD 8510 OEM (Turks PRO) | |
---|
GPU Name | RV770 (RV770 CE) | vs | Turks (Turks PRO) |
Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 256 mm² | vs | 118 mm² |
Transistors | 956 million | vs | 716 million |
Shaders | 640 | vs | 480 |
Compute Units | 8 | vs | 6 |
Core clock | 750 MHz | vs | 650 MHz |
ROPs | 8 | vs | 8 |
TMUs | 32 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 4730 | | Radeon HD 8510 OEM (Turks PRO) | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR3 |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 128 bit |
Memory Speed | 900 MHz
3600 MHz effective | vs | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 512 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 4730 | | Radeon HD 8510 OEM (Turks PRO) | |
---|
TDP | 110 watts | vs | 60 watts |
Release Date | 8 Jun 2009 | vs | 23 Jul 2013 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better