Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon HD 8510 OEM (Turks PRO)
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 4770 |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8510 OEM (Turks PRO) |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 4770 | | Radeon HD 8510 OEM (Turks PRO) | |
|---|
| GPU Name | RV740 () | vs | Turks (Turks PRO) |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 137 mm² | vs | 118 mm² |
| Transistors | 826 million | vs | 716 million |
| Shaders | 640 | vs | 480 |
| Compute Units | 8 | vs | 6 |
| Core clock | 750 MHz | vs | 650 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 32 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 4770 | | Radeon HD 8510 OEM (Turks PRO) | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 800 MHz
3200 MHz effective | vs | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 512 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 4770 | | Radeon HD 8510 OEM (Turks PRO) | |
|---|
| TDP | 80 watts | vs | 60 watts |
| Release Date | 28 Apr 2009 | vs | 23 Jul 2013 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better