Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs GeForce GTX 260
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 260 |
| 104 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 4870 X2 . |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 4870 X2
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 4870 X2 | | GeForce GTX 260 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | R700 (R700 XT) | vs | GT200 (G200-100-A2) |
| Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 65 nm |
| Die Size | 256 mm² | vs | 576 mm² |
| Transistors | 956 million | vs | 1,400 million |
| Shaders | 800 | vs | 192 |
| Compute Units | 10 | vs | 8 |
| Core clock | 700 MHz | vs | 576 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | vs | 28 |
| TMUs | 40 | vs | 64 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 4870 X2 | | GeForce GTX 260 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 256 bit x2 | vs | 448 bit |
| Memory Speed | 900 MHz
3600 MHz effective | vs | 999 MHz
1998 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 896 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 4870 X2 | | GeForce GTX 260 | |
|---|
| TDP | 286 watts | vs | 182 watts |
| Release Date | 12 Aug 2008 | vs | 16 Jun 2008 |
Radeon HD 4870 X2
22.40 GP/s
GeForce GTX 260
16.10 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 4870 X2
56.00 GT/s
GeForce GTX 260
36.90 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 4870 X2
230.00 GB/s
GeForce GTX 260
112.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 4870 X2
2240.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 260
476.90 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better