Radeon HD 5450 vs Radeon R5 235 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 5450 |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R5 235 OEM |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon R5 235 OEM
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 5450 | | Radeon R5 235 OEM | |
---|
GPU Name | Cedar (Cedar PRO) | vs | Caicos (Caicos XT) |
Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 59 mm² | vs | 67 mm² |
Transistors | 292 million | vs | 370 million |
Shaders | 80 | vs | 160 |
Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
Core clock | 650 MHz | vs | 775 MHz |
ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
TMUs | 8 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 5450 | | Radeon R5 235 OEM | |
---|
Memory Type | DDR2 | vs | DDR3 |
Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 64 bit |
Memory Speed | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 512 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 5450 | | Radeon R5 235 OEM | |
---|
TDP | 19 watts | vs | 35 watts |
Release Date | 4 Feb 2010 | vs | 21 Dec 2013 |
Radeon HD 5450
2.60 GP/s
Radeon R5 235 OEM
3.10 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 5450
5.20 GT/s
Radeon R5 235 OEM
6.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 5450
6.40 GB/s
Radeon R5 235 OEM
14.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 5450
104.00 GFLOPs
Radeon R5 235 OEM
248.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better