Radeon HD 5470 vs GeForce GT 320 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 5470 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 320 OEM |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends GeForce GT 320 OEM
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 5470 | | GeForce GT 320 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Cedar (Cedar PRO) | vs | GT215 (GT215-301-A3) |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 59 mm² | vs | 144 mm² |
| Transistors | 292 million | vs | 727 million |
| Shaders | 80 | vs | 72 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 3 |
| Core clock | 650 MHz | vs | 540 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 5470 | | GeForce GT 320 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective | vs | 790 MHz
1580 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 512 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 5470 | | GeForce GT 320 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 19 watts | vs | 43 watts |
| Release Date | 13 Feb 2012 | vs | 2 Feb 2010 |
Radeon HD 5470
2.60 GP/s
GeForce GT 320 OEM
4.32 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 5470
5.20 GT/s
GeForce GT 320 OEM
13.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 5470
6.40 GB/s
GeForce GT 320 OEM
25.30 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 5470
104.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GT 320 OEM
187.50 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better