Radeon HD 6990M vs Radeon R7 250
Summary
Radeon HD 6990M
116%
Radeon R7 250
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6990M |
Around 16% higher average synthetic performance. |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 250 |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Mantle |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 6990M
The Radeon HD 6990M is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 6990M | | Radeon R7 250 | |
---|
GPU Name | Blackcomb (Blackcomb XTX) | vs | Oland (Oland XT) |
Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 212 mm² | vs | 90 mm² |
Transistors | 1,700 million | vs | 1,040 million |
Shaders | 1120 | vs | 384 |
Compute Units | 14 | vs | 6 |
Core clock | 715 MHz | vs | 1000 MHz |
ROPs | 32 | vs | 8 |
TMUs | 56 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 6990M | | Radeon R7 250 | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit |
Memory Speed | 900 MHz
3600 MHz effective | vs | 1150 MHz
4600 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 6990M | | Radeon R7 250 | |
---|
TDP | 100 watts | vs | 65 watts |
Release Date | 12 Jul 2011 | vs | 8 Oct 2013 |
Radeon HD 6990M
22.88 GP/s
Radeon R7 250
8.00 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 6990M
40.00 GT/s
Radeon R7 250
24.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 6990M
115.20 GB/s
Radeon R7 250
73.60 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 6990M
1601.60 GFLOPs
Radeon R7 250
768.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
Radeon HD 6990M
3190
Radeon R7 250
2740
Points (higher is better)