Radeon HD 8330 IGP vs GeForce GT 220 OEM

Radeon HD 8330 IGP
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 13 Aug 2013
Radeon HD 8330 IGP
GeForce GT 220 OEM
Memory: 512Mb DDR2DESKTOP
Release date: 12 Oct 2009
GeForce GT 220 OEM
You are comparing OEM or variant versions of at least one VGA. Did you mean Radeon HD 8330 IGP vs GeForce GT 220 instead?

Summary

Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8330 IGP

43 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GT 220 OEM .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Reasons to consider GeForce GT 220 OEM

Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor

No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.


Specifications

Core Configuration

Radeon HD 8330 IGPGeForce GT 220 OEM
GPU NameKalindi ()vsGT216 (GT216-055-A3)
Fab Process28 nmvs40 nm
Die Size110 mm²vs100 mm²
Transistors1,178 millionvs486 million
Shaders128vs48
Compute Units2vs2
Core clock497 MHzvs615 MHz
ROPs4vs8
TMUs8vs16

Memory Configuration

Radeon HD 8330 IGPGeForce GT 220 OEM
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsDDR2
Bus WidthSystem Sharedvs128 bit
Memory SpeedSystem Sharedvs1000 MHz
2000 MHz effective
Memory Size0 Mbvs512 Mb

Additional details

Radeon HD 8330 IGPGeForce GT 220 OEM
TDP15 wattsvs58 watts
Release Date13 Aug 2013vs12 Oct 2009

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Radeon HD 8330 IGP
    1.99 GP/s
  • GeForce GT 220 OEM
    4.92 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Radeon HD 8330 IGP
    3.98 GT/s
  • GeForce GT 220 OEM
    9.84 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Radeon HD 8330 IGP
    0.00 GB/s
  • GeForce GT 220 OEM
    32.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Radeon HD 8330 IGP
    127.20 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GT 220 OEM
    127.70 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better