Radeon R2 Graphics IGP (APU E2-4000) vs GeForce 9600 GTX
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon R2 Graphics IGP (APU E2-4000) |
125 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce 9600 GTX . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider GeForce 9600 GTX |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends GeForce 9600 GTX
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon R2 Graphics IGP (APU E2-4000) | | GeForce 9600 GTX | |
---|
GPU Name | Mullins () | vs | G92 () |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 65 nm |
Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 324 mm² |
Transistors | unknown | vs | 754 million |
Shaders | 128 | vs | 96 |
Compute Units | 2 | vs | 6 |
Core clock | 700 MHz | vs | 580 MHz |
ROPs | 4 | vs | 16 |
TMUs | 8 | vs | 48 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R2 Graphics IGP (APU E2-4000) | | GeForce 9600 GTX | |
---|
Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR3 |
Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 256 bit |
Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 700 MHz
1400 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R2 Graphics IGP (APU E2-4000) | | GeForce 9600 GTX | |
---|
TDP | 15 watts | vs | 140 watts |
Release Date | 27 Feb 2015 | vs | 27 May 2009 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better