Radeon HD 7480D IGP vs Radeon R2 Graphics IGP (APU E2-4000)
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 7480D IGP |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R2 Graphics IGP (APU E2-4000) |
50 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 7480D IGP . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 7480D IGP | | Radeon R2 Graphics IGP (APU E2-4000) | |
---|
GPU Name | Scrapper () | vs | Mullins () |
Fab Process | 32 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 246 mm² | vs | 0 mm² |
Transistors | 1,303 million | vs | unknown |
Shaders | 128 | vs | 128 |
Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
Core clock | 723 MHz | vs | 700 MHz |
ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
TMUs | 8 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 7480D IGP | | Radeon R2 Graphics IGP (APU E2-4000) | |
---|
Memory Type | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
Bus Width | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 0 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 7480D IGP | | Radeon R2 Graphics IGP (APU E2-4000) | |
---|
TDP | 65 watts | vs | 15 watts |
Release Date | 2 Oct 2012 | vs | 27 Feb 2015 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better