Radeon R2 Graphics IGP (APU E2-4000) vs Radeon HD 3750
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon R2 Graphics IGP (APU E2-4000) |
| 50 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 3750 . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 3750 |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon R2 Graphics IGP (APU E2-4000) | | Radeon HD 3750 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Mullins () | vs | RV635 (RV635 PRO) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 55 nm |
| Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 135 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | 378 million |
| Shaders | 128 | vs | 120 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 3 |
| Core clock | 700 MHz | vs | 796 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R2 Graphics IGP (APU E2-4000) | | Radeon HD 3750 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 693 MHz
1386 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R2 Graphics IGP (APU E2-4000) | | Radeon HD 3750 | |
|---|
| TDP | 15 watts | vs | 65 watts |
| Release Date | 27 Feb 2015 | vs | 11 Sep 2008 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better