Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) vs GeForce GTX 560
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) |
135 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 560 . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 560 |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports PhysX |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 560
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) | | GeForce GTX 560 | |
---|
GPU Name | Mullins () | vs | GF114 (GF114-325-A1) |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 332 mm² |
Transistors | unknown | vs | 1,950 million |
Shaders | 128 | vs | 336 |
Compute Units | 2 | vs | 7 |
Core clock | 800 MHz | vs | 810 MHz |
ROPs | 4 | vs | 32 |
TMUs | 8 | vs | 56 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) | | GeForce GTX 560 | |
---|
Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 256 bit |
Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 1000 MHz
4000 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) | | GeForce GTX 560 | |
---|
TDP | 15 watts | vs | 150 watts |
Release Date | 11 Jun 2014 | vs | 17 May 2011 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better