Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) vs Radeon HD 6850 X2
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) |
239 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 6850 X2 . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 6850 X2
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) | | Radeon HD 6850 X2 | |
---|
GPU Name | Mullins () | vs | Barts (Barts PRO) |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 255 mm² |
Transistors | unknown | vs | 1,700 million |
Shaders | 128 | vs | 960 |
Compute Units | 2 | vs | 12 |
Core clock | 800 MHz | vs | 800 MHz |
ROPs | 4 | vs | 32 |
TMUs | 8 | vs | 48 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) | | Radeon HD 6850 X2 | |
---|
Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 256 bit x2 |
Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 1050 MHz
4200 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) | | Radeon HD 6850 X2 | |
---|
TDP | 15 watts | vs | 254 watts |
Release Date | 11 Jun 2014 | vs | 19 Sep 2011 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better