Radeon R5 220 OEM vs Radeon R7 360
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon R5 220 OEM |
| 81 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon R7 360 . |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 360 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports TrueAudio |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon R7 360
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon R5 220 OEM | | Radeon R7 360 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Cedar (Cedar PRO) | vs | Tobago (Tobago PRO) |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 59 mm² | vs | 160 mm² |
| Transistors | 292 million | vs | 2,080 million |
| Shaders | 80 | vs | 768 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 12 |
| Core clock | 650 MHz | vs | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 16 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 48 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R5 220 OEM | | Radeon R7 360 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 533 MHz
1066 MHz effective | vs | 1500 MHz
6000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R5 220 OEM | | Radeon R7 360 | |
|---|
| TDP | 19 watts | vs | 100 watts |
| Release Date | 21 Dec 2013 | vs | 18 Jun 2015 |
Radeon R5 220 OEM
2.60 GP/s
Radeon R7 360
16.80 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon R5 220 OEM
5.20 GT/s
Radeon R7 360
50.40 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon R5 220 OEM
8.53 GB/s
Radeon R7 360
96.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon R5 220 OEM
104.00 GFLOPs
Radeon R7 360
1612.80 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better