Radeon R5 Graphics IGP vs GeForce GT 220

Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 14 Jun 2014
Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
GeForce GT 220
Memory: 1024Mb GDDR3DESKTOP
Release date: 26 Jan 2010
GeForce GT 220

Summary

Reasons to consider Radeon R5 Graphics IGP

43 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GT 220 .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.

Reasons to consider GeForce GT 220

Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor

Radeon R5 Graphics IGP

HWBench recommends Radeon R5 Graphics IGP

Based on theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Core Configuration

Radeon R5 Graphics IGPGeForce GT 220
GPU NameMullins ()vsG94 ()
Fab Process28 nmvs65 nm
Die Size0 mm²vs240 mm²
Transistorsunknownvs505 million
Shaders128vs48
Compute Units2vs2
Core clock800 MHzvs600 MHz
ROPs4vs16
TMUs8vs24

Memory Configuration

Radeon R5 Graphics IGPGeForce GT 220
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsGDDR3
Bus WidthSystem Sharedvs256 bit
Memory SpeedSystem Sharedvs700 MHz
1400 MHz effective
Memory Size0 Mbvs1024 Mb

Additional details

Radeon R5 Graphics IGPGeForce GT 220
TDP15 wattsvs58 watts
Release Date14 Jun 2014vs26 Jan 2010

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
    3.20 GP/s
  • GeForce GT 220
    9.60 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
    6.40 GT/s
  • GeForce GT 220
    14.40 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
    0.00 GB/s
  • GeForce GT 220
    44.80 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
    204.80 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GT 220
    144.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better