Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7700K) vs Radeon R7 250
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7700K) |
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 250 |
Around 34% higher average synthetic performance. |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Mantle |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon R7 250
The Radeon R7 250 is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).
Core Configuration
| Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7700K) | | Radeon R7 250 | |
---|
GPU Name | Spectre () | vs | Oland (Oland XT) |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 245 mm² | vs | 90 mm² |
Transistors | 2,410 million | vs | 1,040 million |
Shaders | 384 | vs | 384 |
Compute Units | 6 | vs | 6 |
Core clock | 554 MHz | vs | 1000 MHz |
ROPs | 8 | vs | 8 |
TMUs | 24 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7700K) | | Radeon R7 250 | |
---|
Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 128 bit |
Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 1150 MHz
4600 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7700K) | | Radeon R7 250 | |
---|
TDP | 90 watts | vs | 65 watts |
Release Date | 17 Feb 2014 | vs | 8 Oct 2013 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better
Points (higher is better)