Radeon R9 M380 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Radeon R9 M380
Memory: 4096Mb GDDR5MOBILE
Release date: 5 May 2015
Radeon R9 M380
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 5 Sep 2014
Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Summary

Reasons to consider Radeon R9 M380

Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports FreeSync
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports TrueAudio
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 6200


Radeon R9 M380

HWBench recommends Radeon R9 M380

Based on theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Core Configuration

Radeon R9 M380Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU NameStrato (Strato PRO)vsBroadwell GT3e ()
Fab Process28 nmvs14 nm
Die Size160 mm²vs49 mm²
Transistors2,080 millionvs189 million
Shaders768vs384
Compute Units12vs0
Core clock900 MHzvs300 MHz
ROPs16vs6
TMUs48vs48

Memory Configuration

Radeon R9 M380Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Memory TypeGDDR5vsSystem Shared
Bus Width128 bitvsSystem Shared
Memory Speed1500 MHz
6000 MHz effective
vsSystem Shared
Memory Size4096 Mbvs0 Mb

Additional details

Radeon R9 M380Iris Pro Graphics 6200
TDP0 wattsvs15 watts
Release Date5 May 2015vs5 Sep 2014

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Radeon R9 M380
    16.00 GP/s
  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    1.80 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Radeon R9 M380
    48.00 GT/s
  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    14.40 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Radeon R9 M380
    96.00 GB/s
  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    0.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Radeon R9 M380
    1536.00 GFLOPs
  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    230.40 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better