Radeon R9 M380 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon R9 M380 |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports FreeSync |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports TrueAudio |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
HWBench recommends Radeon R9 M380
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon R9 M380 | | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
---|
GPU Name | Strato (Strato PRO) | vs | Broadwell GT3e () |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 14 nm |
Die Size | 160 mm² | vs | 49 mm² |
Transistors | 2,080 million | vs | 189 million |
Shaders | 768 | vs | 384 |
Compute Units | 12 | vs | 0 |
Core clock | 900 MHz | vs | 300 MHz |
ROPs | 16 | vs | 6 |
TMUs | 48 | vs | 48 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R9 M380 | | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | System Shared |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | System Shared |
Memory Speed | 1500 MHz
6000 MHz effective | vs | System Shared |
Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 0 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R9 M380 | | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
---|
TDP | 0 watts | vs | 15 watts |
Release Date | 5 May 2015 | vs | 5 Sep 2014 |
Radeon R9 M380
16.00 GP/s
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
1.80 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon R9 M380
48.00 GT/s
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
14.40 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon R9 M380
96.00 GB/s
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
0.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon R9 M380
1536.00 GFLOPs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
230.40 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better