Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 260
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon RX 5700 XT |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 260 |
| 43 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon RX 5700 XT . |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends Radeon RX 5700 XT
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | | GeForce GTX 260 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Navi 10 (Navi 10 XT) | vs | GT200 (G200-100-A2) |
| Fab Process | 7 nm | vs | 65 nm |
| Die Size | 254 mm² | vs | 576 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | 1,400 million |
| Shaders | 2560 | vs | 192 |
| Compute Units | 40 | vs | 8 |
| Core clock | 1605 MHz | vs | 576 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | vs | 28 |
| TMUs | 256 | vs | 64 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | | GeForce GTX 260 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 448 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1750 MHz
14000 MHz effective | vs | 999 MHz
1998 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 8192 Mb | vs | 896 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | | GeForce GTX 260 | |
|---|
| TDP | 225 watts | vs | 182 watts |
| Release Date | 7 Jul 2019 | vs | 16 Jun 2008 |
Radeon RX 5700 XT
112.30 GP/s
GeForce GTX 260
16.10 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon RX 5700 XT
449.30 GT/s
GeForce GTX 260
36.90 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon RX 5700 XT
448.00 GB/s
GeForce GTX 260
112.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon RX 5700 XT
8980.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 260
476.90 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better