AMD A6-9500E vs AMD E2-2000
Summary
Reasons to consider AMD A6-9500E |
| This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
| Higher theoretical single-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture. |
Reasons to consider AMD E2-2000 |
| 47 watts lower power draw. |
Gaming
No clear winner declared
Productivity
No clear winner declared
Features
| AMD A6-9500E | | AMD E2-2000 | |
|---|
| MMX | | | |
| 3DNow! | | | |
| SSE | | | |
| SSE2 | | | |
| SSE3 | | | |
| SSE4A | | | |
| AMD64 | | | |
| CnQ | | | |
| NX bit | | | |
| AMD-V | | | |
| SSSE3 | | | |
| SSE4a | | | |
| PowerNow! | | | |
Architecture
| AMD A6-9500E | | AMD E2-2000 | |
|---|
| Architecture | AMD Excavator | vs | AMD Bobcat |
| Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | vs | DDR3 |
| Codename | Bristol Ridge | vs | Zacate |
| Release Date | Sep 2016 | vs | Jan 2013 |
Cores
| AMD A6-9500E | | AMD E2-2000 | |
|---|
| Cores | 2 | vs | 2 |
| Threads | 2 | vs | 2 |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon R5 | vs | Radeon HD 7340 |
Cache
| AMD A6-9500E | | AMD E2-2000 | |
|---|
| L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | vs | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 0 KB | vs | 0 KB |
Physical
| AMD A6-9500E | | AMD E2-2000 | |
|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | vs | AMD Socket FT1 |
| Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | 100°C |
| Package | uPGA | vs | BGA2 |
| Die Size | unknown | vs | 75mm² |
| Process | 14 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Performance
| AMD A6-9500E | | AMD E2-2000 | |
|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 3000 MHz | vs | 1750 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 3400 MHz | vs | none |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 200 MHz |
| Voltage | unknown | vs | 1.35 V |
| TDP | 65 W | vs | 18 W |
AMD A6-9500E
2346 points
AMD E2-2000
1750 points
Points - higher is better
AMD A6-9500E
3601 points
AMD E2-2000
3500 points
Points - higher is better