AMD E2-2000 vs Intel Core M-5Y51

AMD E2-2000
AMD Socket FT1DESKTOP
1750 MHz / Cores: 2 / Jan 2013
AMD E2-2000
Intel Core M-5Y51
MOBILE
1100 MHz / Cores: 2 / Oct 2014
Intel Core M-5Y51

Summary

Reasons to consider AMD E2-2000

Higher theoretical multi-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture.

Reasons to consider Intel Core M-5Y51

This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture.

Intel Core M-5Y51

Gaming

HWBench recommends Intel Core M-5Y51

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.

No winner

Productivity

No clear winner declared



Specifications

Features

AMD E2-2000Intel Core M-5Y51
MMX
3DNow!
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4a
AMD64
PowerNow!
NX bit
AMD-V
SSE4.2
AVX
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
Hyper-Threading

Architecture

AMD E2-2000Intel Core M-5Y51
ArchitectureAMD BobcatvsIntel_Broadwell
MarketDesktopvsMobile
Memory SupportDDR3vsDDR4
CodenameZacatevsBroadwell-Y
Release DateJan 2013vsOct 2014

Cores

AMD E2-2000Intel Core M-5Y51
Cores2vs2
Threads2vs4
SMPs1vs1
Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 7340vsIntel HD 5300

Cache

AMD E2-2000Intel Core M-5Y51
L1 Cache64 KB (per core)vs64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache512 KB (per core)vs256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache0 KBvs4096 KB (shared)

Physical

AMD E2-2000Intel Core M-5Y51
SocketAMD Socket FT1vs
Max Case Temp100°Cvsunknown
PackageBGA2vs
Die Size75mm²vs50mm²
Process40 nmvs14 nm

Performance

AMD E2-2000Intel Core M-5Y51
Cpu Frequency1750 MHzvs1100 MHz
Turbo Clocknonevs2600 MHz
Base Clock200 MHzvs100 MHz
Voltage1.35 Vvsunknown
TDP18 Wvs5 W

Raw performance index

Raw single-thread performance estimation

  • AMD E2-2000
    1750 points
  • Intel Core M-5Y51
    2912 points

Points - higher is better

Raw multi-thread performance estimation

  • AMD E2-2000
    3500 points
  • Intel Core M-5Y51
    2956 points

Points - higher is better