AMD C-50 vs Intel Celeron 847
Summary
AMD C-50
100%
Intel Celeron 847
185%
Relative performance
AMD C-50
100%
Intel Celeron 847
198%
Relative performance
AMD C-50
100%
Intel Celeron 847
177%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider AMD C-50 |
| None |
Reasons to consider Intel Celeron 847 |
| Much higher single threaded performance (around 98% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications. |
| Much higher multi threaded performance (around 77% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
| Around 85% higher average synthetic performance. |
Gaming
HWBench recommends Intel Celeron 847
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends Intel Celeron 847
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
| AMD C-50 | | Intel Celeron 847 | |
|---|
| | | |
| MMX | | | |
| SSE | | | |
| SSE2 | | | |
| SSE3 | | | |
| SSSE3 | | | |
| SSE4.1 | | | |
| SSE4.2 | | | |
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST) | | | |
| Intel 64 | | | |
| XD bit (an NX bit implementation) | | | |
| Intel VT-x | | | |
| Smart Cache. | | | |
Architecture
| AMD C-50 | | Intel Celeron 847 | |
|---|
| Architecture | AMD Bobcat | vs | Intel_SandyBridge |
| Market | Mobile | vs | Mobile |
| Memory Support | unknown | vs | DDR3 |
| Codename | Ontario | vs | Sandy Bridge |
| Release Date | Jan 2011 | vs | Jun 2011 |
Cores
| AMD C-50 | | Intel Celeron 847 | |
|---|
| Cores | 2 | vs | 2 |
| Threads | 2 | vs | 2 |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon HD 6250 | vs | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Cache
| AMD C-50 | | Intel Celeron 847 | |
|---|
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | vs | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 0 KB | vs | 2048 KB (shared) |
Physical
| AMD C-50 | | Intel Celeron 847 | |
|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket FT1 | vs | Intel BGA1023 |
| Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | unknown |
| Package | | vs | rPGA |
| Die Size | 75mm² | vs | 131mm² |
| Process | 40 nm | vs | 32 nm |
Performance
| AMD C-50 | | Intel Celeron 847 | |
|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 1000 MHz | vs | 1100 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | none | vs | none |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz |
| Voltage | 1.35 V | vs | unknown |
| TDP | 9 W | vs | 17 W |
AMD C-50
1000 points
Intel Celeron 847
1100 points
Points - higher is better
AMD C-50
2000 points
Intel Celeron 847
2200 points
Points - higher is better
AMD C-50
669
Intel Celeron 847
1396
points - higher is better
AMD C-50
402
Intel Celeron 847
925
points - higher is better
AMD C-50
742
Intel Celeron 847
1575
points - higher is better
AMD C-50
389
Intel Celeron 847
846
points - higher is better
AMD C-50
635.5
Intel Celeron 847
992.5
points - higher is better
AMD C-50
661
Intel Celeron 847
1269.5
points - higher is better
AMD C-50
1281.5
Intel Celeron 847
2407.5
points - higher is better
AMD C-50
0.38
Intel Celeron 847
0.65
points - higher is better
AMD C-50
76
Intel Celeron 847
35.5
seconds - lower is better
AMD C-50
111.21
Intel Celeron 847
80.36
seconds - lower is better