AMD E2-1800 vs AMD E2-2000
Summary
AMD E2-1800
100%
AMD E2-2000
100%
Relative performance
AMD E2-1800
100%
AMD E2-2000
100%
Relative performance
AMD E2-1800
100%
AMD E2-2000
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider AMD E2-1800 |
| None |
Reasons to consider AMD E2-2000 |
| None |
Gaming
No clear winner declared
Productivity
No clear winner declared
Features
| AMD E2-1800 | | AMD E2-2000 | |
|---|
| MMX | | | |
| 3DNow! | | | |
| SSE | | | |
| SSE2 | | | |
| SSE3 | | | |
| SSSE3 | | | |
| SSE4a | | | |
| AMD64 | | | |
| PowerNow! | | | |
| NX bit | | | |
| AMD-V | | | |
Architecture
| AMD E2-1800 | | AMD E2-2000 | |
|---|
| Architecture | AMD Bobcat | vs | AMD Bobcat |
| Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
| Codename | Zacate | vs | Zacate |
| Release Date | Jun 2012 | vs | Jan 2013 |
Cores
| AMD E2-1800 | | AMD E2-2000 | |
|---|
| Cores | 2 | vs | 2 |
| Threads | 2 | vs | 2 |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon HD 7340 | vs | Radeon HD 7340 |
Cache
| AMD E2-1800 | | AMD E2-2000 | |
|---|
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | vs | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 0 KB | vs | 0 KB |
Physical
| AMD E2-1800 | | AMD E2-2000 | |
|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket FT1 | vs | AMD Socket FT1 |
| Max Case Temp | 100°C | vs | 100°C |
| Package | BGA2 | vs | BGA2 |
| Die Size | 75mm² | vs | 75mm² |
| Process | 40 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Performance
| AMD E2-1800 | | AMD E2-2000 | |
|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 1700 MHz | vs | 1750 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | none | vs | none |
| Base Clock | 200 MHz | vs | 200 MHz |
| Voltage | 1.35 V | vs | 1.35 V |
| TDP | 18 W | vs | 18 W |
AMD E2-1800
1700 points
AMD E2-2000
1750 points
Points - higher is better
AMD E2-1800
3400 points
AMD E2-2000
3500 points
Points - higher is better
AMD E2-1800
1094
AMD E2-2000
1102
points - higher is better
AMD E2-1800
627
AMD E2-2000
631
points - higher is better