AMD Ryzen 5 3500U vs Intel Core i7-4770HQ

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
AMD Socket FP5MOBILE
2100 MHz / Cores: 4 / Jan 2019
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
Intel Core i7-4770HQ
Intel BGA1364MOBILE
2200 MHz / Cores: 4 / Jul 2014
Intel Core i7-4770HQ

Summary

Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
Higher theoretical single-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture.

Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-4770HQ

None

No winner

Gaming

No clear winner declared


No winner

Productivity

No clear winner declared



Specifications

Features

AMD Ryzen 5 3500UIntel Core i7-4770HQ
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
EVP
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
Hyper-Threading
AES-NI
TXT
TSX
CLMUL

Architecture

AMD Ryzen 5 3500UIntel Core i7-4770HQ
ArchitectureAMD Zen+vsIntel_Haswell
MarketMobilevsMobile
Memory SupportDDR4 Dual-channelvsDDR3
CodenamePicassovsCrystalwell
Release DateJan 2019vsJul 2014

Cores

AMD Ryzen 5 3500UIntel Core i7-4770HQ
Cores4vs4
Threads8vs8
SMPs1vs1
Integrated GraphicsRadeon Vega 8vsIntel HD 5200

Cache

AMD Ryzen 5 3500UIntel Core i7-4770HQ
L1 Cache96K (per core)vs64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache512K (per core)vs256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache4MB (shared)vs8192 KB (shared)

Physical

AMD Ryzen 5 3500UIntel Core i7-4770HQ
SocketAMD Socket FP5vsIntel BGA1364
Max Case TempN/Avs100°C
PackageFP5vsFC-BGA1364
Die Size210mm²vs264mm²
Process12 nmvs22 nm

Performance

AMD Ryzen 5 3500UIntel Core i7-4770HQ
Cpu Frequency2100 MHzvs2200 MHz
Turbo Clock3700 MHzvs3400 MHz
Base Clock100 MHzvs100 MHz
VoltageN/Avsunknown
TDP15 Wvs47 W

Raw performance index

Raw single-thread performance estimation

  • AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
    4070 points
  • Intel Core i7-4770HQ
    3808 points

Points - higher is better

Raw multi-thread performance estimation

  • AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
    11272 points
  • Intel Core i7-4770HQ
    11827 points

Points - higher is better