GeForce 910M vs GeForce 210
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 910M |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce 210 |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends GeForce 910M
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 910M | | GeForce 210 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GF117 () | vs | GT218 (GT218-300-B1) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 116 mm² | vs | 57 mm² |
| Transistors | 585 million | vs | 260 million |
| Shaders | 96 | vs | 16 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 775 MHz | vs | 520 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 16 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 910M | | GeForce 210 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective | vs | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 910M | | GeForce 210 | |
|---|
| TDP | 33 watts | vs | 31 watts |
| Release Date | 18 Aug 2015 | vs | 12 Oct 2009 |
GeForce 910M
3.10 GP/s
GeForce 210
2.08 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce 910M
12.40 GT/s
GeForce 210
4.16 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce 910M
14.40 GB/s
GeForce 210
6.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce 910M
297.60 GFLOPs
GeForce 210
39.36 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better