GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs GeForce 210 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider GeForce 210 OEM |
99 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB . |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB | | GeForce 210 OEM | |
---|
GPU Name | GA106 (GA106-150-A1) | vs | GT216 () |
Fab Process | 8 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 276 mm² | vs | 100 mm² |
Transistors | 13,250 million | vs | 486 million |
Shaders | 2560 | vs | 16 |
Compute Units | 20 | vs | 2 |
Core clock | 1552 MHz | vs | 475 MHz |
ROPs | 48 | vs | 4 |
TMUs | 80 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB | | GeForce 210 OEM | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | DDR2 |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit |
Memory Speed | 1750 MHz
14 Gbps effective | vs | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 8192 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB | | GeForce 210 OEM | |
---|
TDP | 130 watts | vs | 31 watts |
Release Date | 4 Jan 2022 | vs | 4 Sep 2009 |
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
85.30 GP/s
GeForce 210 OEM
1.90 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
142.20 GT/s
GeForce 210 OEM
3.80 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
224.00 GB/s
GeForce 210 OEM
6.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
9098.00 GFLOPs
GeForce 210 OEM
35.20 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better