HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge GT2) vs GeForce 210
Summary
Reasons to consider HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge GT2) |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Reasons to consider GeForce 210 |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge GT2)
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge GT2) | | GeForce 210 | |
---|
GPU Name | Ivy Bridge GT2 () | vs | GT218 (GT218-300-B1) |
Fab Process | 22 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 160 mm² | vs | 57 mm² |
Transistors | 392 million | vs | 260 million |
Shaders | 16 | vs | 16 |
Compute Units | 0 | vs | 2 |
Core clock | 650 MHz | vs | 520 MHz |
ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
TMUs | 4 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge GT2) | | GeForce 210 | |
---|
Memory Type | System Shared | vs | DDR3 |
Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 64 bit |
Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge GT2) | | GeForce 210 | |
---|
TDP | 0 watts | vs | 31 watts |
Release Date | 14 May 2012 | vs | 12 Oct 2009 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better