HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge GT2) vs HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)

HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge GT2)
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 14 May 2012
HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge GT2)
HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 1 Sep 2015
HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)

Summary

Reasons to consider HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge GT2)

Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.

Reasons to consider HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge GT2)

HWBench recommends HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge GT2)

Based on theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Core Configuration

HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge GT2)HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
GPU NameIvy Bridge GT2 ()vsSkylake GT1 ()
Fab Process22 nmvs14 nm
Die Size160 mm²vs49 mm²
Transistors392 millionvs189 million
Shaders16vs96
Compute Units0vs0
Core clock650 MHzvs300 MHz
ROPs4vs3
TMUs4vs12

Memory Configuration

HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge GT2)HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsSystem Shared
Bus WidthSystem SharedvsSystem Shared
Memory SpeedSystem SharedvsSystem Shared
Memory Size0 Mbvs0 Mb

Additional details

HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge GT2)HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
TDP0 wattsvs15 watts
Release Date14 May 2012vs1 Sep 2015

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge GT2)
    2.60 GP/s
  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    0.90 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge GT2)
    2.60 GT/s
  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    3.60 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge GT2)
    0.00 GB/s
  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    0.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge GT2)
    20.80 GFLOPs
  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    57.60 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better