HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) vs GeForce 9400 GT

HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 2 Sep 2013
HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
GeForce 9400 GT
Memory: 128Mb DDR2DESKTOP
Release date: 1 Aug 2008
GeForce 9400 GT

Summary

Reasons to consider HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)

46 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce 9400 GT .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Reasons to consider GeForce 9400 GT

Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor

GeForce 9400 GT

HWBench recommends GeForce 9400 GT

Based on theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Core Configuration

HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)GeForce 9400 GT
GPU NameBay Trail GT1 ()vsG86 ()
Fab Process22 nmvs80 nm
Die Size177 mm²vs127 mm²
Transistors392 millionvs210 million
Shaders4vs16
Compute Units0vs2
Core clock350 MHzvs459 MHz
ROPs2vs4
TMUs2vs8

Memory Configuration

HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)GeForce 9400 GT
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsDDR2
Bus WidthSystem Sharedvs64 bit
Memory SpeedSystem Sharedvs600 MHz
1200 MHz effective
Memory Size0 Mbvs128 Mb

Additional details

HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)GeForce 9400 GT
TDP4 wattsvs50 watts
Release Date2 Sep 2013vs1 Aug 2008

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
    0.70 GP/s
  • GeForce 9400 GT
    1.84 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
    0.70 GT/s
  • GeForce 9400 GT
    3.67 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
    0.00 GB/s
  • GeForce 9400 GT
    9.60 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
    2.80 GFLOPs
  • GeForce 9400 GT
    29.38 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better