Radeon HD 3650 vs GeForce GT 220
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 3650 |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 220 |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 3650
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 3650 | | GeForce GT 220 | |
---|
GPU Name | RV635 (RV635 PRO) | vs | G94 () |
Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 65 nm |
Die Size | 135 mm² | vs | 240 mm² |
Transistors | 378 million | vs | 505 million |
Shaders | 120 | vs | 48 |
Compute Units | 3 | vs | 2 |
Core clock | 725 MHz | vs | 600 MHz |
ROPs | 4 | vs | 16 |
TMUs | 8 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 3650 | | GeForce GT 220 | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | GDDR3 |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 256 bit |
Memory Speed | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective | vs | 700 MHz
1400 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 256 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 3650 | | GeForce GT 220 | |
---|
TDP | 65 watts | vs | 58 watts |
Release Date | 20 Jan 2008 | vs | 26 Jan 2010 |
Radeon HD 3650
2.90 GP/s
GeForce GT 220
9.60 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 3650
5.80 GT/s
GeForce GT 220
14.40 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 3650
25.60 GB/s
GeForce GT 220
44.80 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 3650
174.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GT 220
144.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better