Intel Celeron G5900 vs AMD FX-6100
Summary
Reasons to consider Intel Celeron G5900 |
| This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
| Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the AMD FX-6100. |
| Higher theoretical single-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture. |
Reasons to consider AMD FX-6100 |
| Higher theoretical multi-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture. |
Gaming
No clear winner declared
Productivity
No clear winner declared
Features
| Intel Celeron G5900 | | AMD FX-6100 | |
|---|
| MMX | | | |
| SSE | | | |
| SSE2 | | | |
| SSE3 | | | |
| SSSE3 | | | |
| SSE4.2 | | | |
| AVX | | | |
| AVX2 | | | |
| EIST | | | |
| Intel 64 | | | |
| XD bit | | | |
| VT-x | | | |
| VT-d | | | |
| AES-NI | | | |
| TSX | | | |
| TXT | | | |
| CLMUL | | | |
| FMA3 | | | |
| F16C | | | |
| BMI1 | | | |
| BMI2 | | | |
| ABM | | | |
| ADX | | | |
| RdRand | | | |
| SSE4.1 | | | |
| SSE4a | | | |
| AMD64 | | | |
| AMD-V | | | |
| AES | | | |
| CVT16 | | | |
| EVP | | | |
| FMA4 | | | |
| XOP | | | |
| Turbo Core | | | |
| HT3.1 | | | |
Architecture
| Intel Celeron G5900 | | AMD FX-6100 | |
|---|
| Architecture | Intel_Cometlake | vs | AMD Bulldozer |
| Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4-2666 MHz
Dual-channel | vs | DDR3 |
| Codename | Comet Lake | vs | Zambezi |
| Release Date | Apr 2020 | vs | Oct 2011 |
Cores
| Intel Celeron G5900 | | AMD FX-6100 | |
|---|
| Cores | 2 | vs | 6 |
| Threads | 2 | vs | 6 |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 |
| Integrated Graphics | UHD 610 | vs | No |
Cache
| Intel Celeron G5900 | | AMD FX-6100 | |
|---|
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | vs | 288 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | vs | 6144 KB |
| L3 Cache | 2MB (shared) | vs | 8192 KB (shared) |
Physical
| Intel Celeron G5900 | | AMD FX-6100 | |
|---|
| Socket | Intel Socket 1200 | vs | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Max Case Temp | 72°C | vs | unknown |
| Package | FC-LGA1200 | vs | uPGA |
| Die Size | unknown | vs | 315mm² |
| Process | 14 nm | vs | 32 nm |
Performance
| Intel Celeron G5900 | | AMD FX-6100 | |
|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 3400 MHz | vs | 3300 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | none | vs | 3900 MHz |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 200 MHz |
| Voltage | N/A | vs | 1.425 V |
| TDP | 58 W | vs | 95 W |
Intel Celeron G5900
4080 points
AMD FX-6100
2301 points
Points - higher is better
Intel Celeron G5900
8160 points
AMD FX-6100
9579 points
Points - higher is better