HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) vs GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
Summary
Reasons to consider HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) |
Reasons to consider GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) | | GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Sandy Bridge GT1 () | vs | GT218 (GT218-670-B1) |
| Fab Process | 32 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 149 mm² | vs | 57 mm² |
| Transistors | 189 million | vs | 260 million |
| Shaders | 6 | vs | 16 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 850 MHz | vs | 589 MHz |
| ROPs | 1 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 1 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) | | GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | DDR2 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 600 MHz
1200 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 128 Mb |
Additional details
| HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) | | GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 | |
|---|
| TDP | 0 watts | vs | 50 watts |
| Release Date | 5 Jan 2011 | vs | 13 Jun 2012 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better